<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for jamesnotjim.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesnotjim.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesnotjim.com</link>
	<description>a music site of solo recordings by james "wheatbread" martin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;A Sketch&#8221; by CBTScheid</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2008/04/a-sketch/comment-page-1/#comment-3589</link>
		<dc:creator>CBTScheid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/32#comment-3589</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this song.  I was viewing a Captivate article and followed a link to here.  What I found was a breath of fresh air to my heart. You are talented!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this song.  I was viewing a Captivate article and followed a link to here.  What I found was a breath of fresh air to my heart. You are talented!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Good Day&#8221; by wheat</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2008/07/good-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/33#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>Right, in this particular case, it works out to once every two bars, but it&#039;s the same concept.

You could do something similar with the &#039;Rang.  With it, you set up the loop and then use the &quot;stack&quot; (momentary) button to add to it.  

The Boss LS-2 might be just the thing.  Thanks for mentioning that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, in this particular case, it works out to once every two bars, but it&#8217;s the same concept.</p>
<p>You could do something similar with the &#8216;Rang.  With it, you set up the loop and then use the &#8220;stack&#8221; (momentary) button to add to it.  </p>
<p>The Boss LS-2 might be just the thing.  Thanks for mentioning that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Good Day&#8221; by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2008/07/good-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/33#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>Oh, okay. That&#039;s what I meant--play them once per bar, not once total.

I&#039;m surprised there&#039;s not an eternal loop mode on the Boomerang. You can do that on the DL-6, by setting the loop mix/feedback fairly low and then just setting the endpoint. But it gets messy fast--I suspect you&#039;re better off with the delays.

The kind of routing you&#039;re talking about is the reason I keep a Boss LS-2 around, but it&#039;s toggle and not momentary. I don&#039;t know if it would be worth checking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, okay. That&#8217;s what I meant&#8211;play them once per bar, not once total.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised there&#8217;s not an eternal loop mode on the Boomerang. You can do that on the DL-6, by setting the loop mix/feedback fairly low and then just setting the endpoint. But it gets messy fast&#8211;I suspect you&#8217;re better off with the delays.</p>
<p>The kind of routing you&#8217;re talking about is the reason I keep a Boss LS-2 around, but it&#8217;s toggle and not momentary. I don&#8217;t know if it would be worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Good Day&#8221; by wheat</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2008/07/good-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/33#comment-2487</guid>
		<description>Ah, to your question.  No, actually.  Since the delay time isn&#039;t all that long, I play the chords (it&#039;s two triple-stops:  each has one note + two harmonics), then riff for a few measures, then hit the chord again.  And I just keep going back and forth like that throughout the track.  Later on, the chords get replaced by some big slides, but then they return at the end.  

With those settings, I get about eight usable repeats before things fade into the background.  

What would really be cool would be some way to switch (via a momentary pedal) between routing through the effect and routing around it.  Then I could decide, on the fly, what gets added to the loop and what doesn&#039;t.  

I guess I can more-or-less do that with the Boomerang&#039;s &quot;stack&quot; feature.  But what I want is really the reverse of that:  by default, I want everything to become part of the loop.  I&#039;d only occasionally want to add some burst of notes that doesn&#039;t need to be looped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, to your question.  No, actually.  Since the delay time isn&#8217;t all that long, I play the chords (it&#8217;s two triple-stops:  each has one note + two harmonics), then riff for a few measures, then hit the chord again.  And I just keep going back and forth like that throughout the track.  Later on, the chords get replaced by some big slides, but then they return at the end.  </p>
<p>With those settings, I get about eight usable repeats before things fade into the background.  </p>
<p>What would really be cool would be some way to switch (via a momentary pedal) between routing through the effect and routing around it.  Then I could decide, on the fly, what gets added to the loop and what doesn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>I guess I can more-or-less do that with the Boomerang&#8217;s &#8220;stack&#8221; feature.  But what I want is really the reverse of that:  by default, I want everything to become part of the loop.  I&#8217;d only occasionally want to add some burst of notes that doesn&#8217;t need to be looped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Good Day&#8221; by wheat</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2008/07/good-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/33#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Thomas.  I wasn&#039;t sure that I liked this one as much as &lt;a href=&quot;http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/32&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the previous one&lt;/a&gt;, but it&#039;s growing on me.  Thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Thomas.  I wasn&#8217;t sure that I liked this one as much as <a href="http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/32" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">the previous one</a>, but it&#8217;s growing on me.  Thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Good Day&#8221; by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2008/07/good-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2485</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/33#comment-2485</guid>
		<description>Very cool. I love how the delays gradually build up a bass rhythm combined with the AM radio-like modulation whistle.

So did you only have to play the double stops once, and then it took over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool. I love how the delays gradually build up a bass rhythm combined with the AM radio-like modulation whistle.</p>
<p>So did you only have to play the double stops once, and then it took over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on End of year project review by wheat</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2007/12/end-of-year-project-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/30#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>I just listened to these as mp3 and it&#039;s amazing how bad the drums sound now that they&#039;ve been compressed.  I&#039;ll have to check the settings on my mp3 encoder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just listened to these as mp3 and it&#8217;s amazing how bad the drums sound now that they&#8217;ve been compressed.  I&#8217;ll have to check the settings on my mp3 encoder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on End of year project review by wheat://wheatdesign.com</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2007/12/end-of-year-project-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>wheat://wheatdesign.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/30#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Shepcat.  I knew I could count on you for some commentary.  I decided to do &quot;Brahm&#039;s Lullaby&quot; for my (soon to be born) son.  I had planned an entire EP of lullaby&#039;s.  So far, this is the only one I&#039;ve worked up.  But, maybe I should take the backing tracks and try to come up with another melody for it, to make it an original work.  

&quot;One Four Five&quot; is one I had entirely forgotten about until I did this bit of winter housekeeping.  I&#039;ll expand on that one.  I can noodle over that progression forever.  The trick will be finding a strong melody for it.  

&quot;Araby&quot; is a track I&#039;ve had around for years but have never recorded.  That one is close to done. Some of the bridge parts (toward the end) are brand new.  So I&#039;m still tinkering with them.  

Good point about the percussion.  I really could use a drummer as a collaborator.  I lay the drum track first and rarely revisit it.  But all of the drum tracks need work.  And I&#039;ll take your advice about mixing them in lower.  

I recorded &quot;Postage&quot; as a backing track for a guitarist friend, who was going to add some lines over the top.  But that never really happened, so I&#039;m going to take it myself and add a melody to it.  I have another mix of it where all the parts are repeated half as many times.   So I&#039;ll go back to that one and try to find a melody.  Good call on the Police vibe.  That whole piece stared out with the electric guitar, which is a Telecaster (like Summers&#039;) and the most Police-ish patch I could find.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Shepcat.  I knew I could count on you for some commentary.  I decided to do &#8220;Brahm&#8217;s Lullaby&#8221; for my (soon to be born) son.  I had planned an entire EP of lullaby&#8217;s.  So far, this is the only one I&#8217;ve worked up.  But, maybe I should take the backing tracks and try to come up with another melody for it, to make it an original work.  </p>
<p>&#8220;One Four Five&#8221; is one I had entirely forgotten about until I did this bit of winter housekeeping.  I&#8217;ll expand on that one.  I can noodle over that progression forever.  The trick will be finding a strong melody for it.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Araby&#8221; is a track I&#8217;ve had around for years but have never recorded.  That one is close to done. Some of the bridge parts (toward the end) are brand new.  So I&#8217;m still tinkering with them.  </p>
<p>Good point about the percussion.  I really could use a drummer as a collaborator.  I lay the drum track first and rarely revisit it.  But all of the drum tracks need work.  And I&#8217;ll take your advice about mixing them in lower.  </p>
<p>I recorded &#8220;Postage&#8221; as a backing track for a guitarist friend, who was going to add some lines over the top.  But that never really happened, so I&#8217;m going to take it myself and add a melody to it.  I have another mix of it where all the parts are repeated half as many times.   So I&#8217;ll go back to that one and try to find a melody.  Good call on the Police vibe.  That whole piece stared out with the electric guitar, which is a Telecaster (like Summers&#8217;) and the most Police-ish patch I could find.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on End of year project review by Shepcat</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2007/12/end-of-year-project-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>Shepcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/30#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>My impressions after a couple of listens:If the melody weren&#039;t so immediately recognizable, your &quot;Brahm&#039;s Lullaby&quot; sounds like contemplative pre- or post-gunfight music from a Western. Not quite Leone (and hence, Morricone) or Peckinpah, but a nice, solid John Sturges effort.Twenty-two seconds of &quot;One Four Five&quot; is not enough. I&#039;d like to hear where you&#039;re taking that. It deserves a longer treatment like &quot;Araby,&quot; which I also like.&quot;Circus&quot; in particular sounds nimble, but on both it and &quot;Portrait,&quot; I wish the percussion, which is a little too metronomic, was mixed at a lower volume so not to distract from your playing.&quot;Postage&quot; sounds like something The Police would have recorded, circa &lt;i&gt;Zenyatta Mondatta.&lt;/i&gt; A little repetitious at first, though; I might like to hear the changeover come sooner than the 1:18 mark.And I get the strongest Stanley Clarke vibe from &quot;Funky Wav.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My impressions after a couple of listens:If the melody weren&#8217;t so immediately recognizable, your &#8220;Brahm&#8217;s Lullaby&#8221; sounds like contemplative pre- or post-gunfight music from a Western. Not quite Leone (and hence, Morricone) or Peckinpah, but a nice, solid John Sturges effort.Twenty-two seconds of &#8220;One Four Five&#8221; is not enough. I&#8217;d like to hear where you&#8217;re taking that. It deserves a longer treatment like &#8220;Araby,&#8221; which I also like.&#8221;Circus&#8221; in particular sounds nimble, but on both it and &#8220;Portrait,&#8221; I wish the percussion, which is a little too metronomic, was mixed at a lower volume so not to distract from your playing.&#8221;Postage&#8221; sounds like something The Police would have recorded, circa <i>Zenyatta Mondatta.</i> A little repetitious at first, though; I might like to hear the changeover come sooner than the 1:18 mark.And I get the strongest Stanley Clarke vibe from &#8220;Funky Wav.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on James, Not Jim on Last.fm + TonePort by wheat</title>
		<link>http://jamesnotjim.com/2007/07/james-not-jim-on-lastfm-toneport/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesnotjim.com/archives/26#comment-296</guid>
		<description>:)  Okay, Shepcat.  I&#039;ll get something new up for you very soon.  Thanks for the encouragement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)  Okay, Shepcat.  I&#8217;ll get something new up for you very soon.  Thanks for the encouragement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

